Do we pay enough attention to costly invasive alien species?
Ugo Arbieu1, Uri Roll2, Reut Vardi3, Ana Sofia Vaz4, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira Caetano1, Andrea Soriano-Redondo5, Ana Novoa6, Elena Angulo7, Franck Courchamp1, Christophe Diagne8, Boris Leroy9, Ivan Jarić1
1Université Paris-Saclay, France; 2Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel; 3Oxford University, United Kingdom; 4CIBIO-InBIO, University of Porto, Portugal; 5University of Helsinki, Finland; 6Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Czech Republic; 7Estación Biológica de Doñana, Spain; 8Institute of Research for Development, France; 9Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, France
Invasive alien species (IAS) are an important driver of biodiversity loss worldwide. Their widespread detrimental ecological impacts contribute to important economic impacts, associated with damage and management costs. Despite this, the general public is less aware of biological invasions compared to other drivers of global change. Public perceptions of IAS may be linked to how much they are incorporated into the conservation discourse. Here, we utilized a conservation culturomics approach to analyze human-nature interactions manifested in large digital databases, improving our understanding of IAS salience and highlighting avenues for conservation communication and decision-making regarding IAS. We investigated the relationships between costs incurred by tetrapod IAS (mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians) in Europe and their internet salience. We hypothesized that IAS with higher costs would have higher salience, suggesting that conservation communication about IAS costs has been effective in raising popular interest. To test this, we used the InvaCost database to extract IAS management and damage costs, and quantified their salience using Google Health internet search volumes and Wikipedia visitation rates in each of the countries where they occur. This method has much promise in contributing toward our understanding of how conservation communication may influence issue salience and subsequent policies.
Where is Wally? The search for the invasive plant Cortaderia selloana on citizen-science and social media images!
Ana Sofia Cardoso1,2,3, Eva Malta-Pinto1,2,3, Siham Tabik4, Tom August5, Helen Elizabeth Roy5, Ricardo Correia6,7,8, Joana Raquel Vicente1,2,3, Ana Sofia Vaz9
1CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal; 2Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal; 3BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal; 4Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Andalusian Research Institute in Data Science and Computational Intelligence, DaSCI, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain; 5UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, OX10 8BB, UK; 6Biodiversity Unit, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland; 7Helsinki Lab of Interdisciplinary Conservation Science (HELICS), Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; 8Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; 9NBI, Natural Business Intelligence, Régia Douro Park, 5000 – 033 Andrães, Vila Real, Portugal
Artificial intelligence techniques, and specifically deep learning, have advanced and empowered the content analysis of digital data, opening promising opportunities for detecting, mapping, and monitoring invasive alien species. In this study, we tested the ability of openly available classification and object detection models (i.e., convolutional neural networks: CNNs) to identify and map the invasive plant Cortaderia selloana (pampas grass) in mainland Portugal. CNNs were trained over citizen science images and then applied to social media content (from Flickr, X/Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook), allowing to classify or detect the species in over 77% of situations. Images where the species was correctly identified were mapped, using their georeferenced coordinates and time stamp (whenever available), showing previously unreported occurrences of Cortaderia selloana, and a tendency for the species expansion from 2019 to 2021. This study shows great potential from deep learning models, citizen science and social media data for the early detection, mapping, and monitoring of invasive plants, and, by extension, for supporting follow-up management options.
Human dimensions of biological invasions: novel research opportunities
Ivan Jaric1,2, Ana Novoa3, Pavel Pipek3,4, Petr Pysek3,4
1Universite Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systematique Evolution, Gif-sur-Yvette, France; 2Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic; 3Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Pruhonice, Czech Republic; 4Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Invasive alien species negatively impact ecosystems, biodiversity, human societies, and economies. To prevent future invasions, it is crucial to understand both the ecological and the human and social factors determining whether a species is picked up, transported and introduced beyond their native range. However, we often have no or little information on key human and social factors. Here, we present a conceptual framework exploring how alien species introductions are shaped by a combination of ecological, and human and social factors, and highlight the potential of the emerging fields of conservation culturomics and iEcology for disentangling their relative importance. We argue that quantifying and assessing the relative importance of the human and social dimensions of alien species introductions can substantially improve our understanding of the invasion process.
Secondary Data: an untapped Treasure for Invasion Biology
Nadja Pernat1,2, Susan Canavan3,4, Marina Golivets5, Jasmijn Hillaert6, Yuval Itescu7,8,9, Ivan Jarić10,11, Hjalte M. R. Mann12, Pavel Pipek3,13, Cristina Preda14, David M Richardson3,15, Heliana Teixeira16, Ana Sofia Vaz17,18,19, Quentin Groom20
1University of Münster, Germany; 2Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research and Applied Ecology (CIBRA), University of Münster, Münster, Germany; 3Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic; 4School of Natural Sciences, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway, Ireland; 5Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Halle, Germany; 6Research Institute of Nature and Forest, Brussels, Belgium; 7Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany; 8Freie Universität Berlin, Germany; 9Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Israel; 10Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Gif-sur-Yvette, France; 11Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic; 12Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Denmark; 13Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; 14Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Ovidius University of Constanta, Romania; 15Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa; 16Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Portugal; 17CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, Portugal; 18BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, Portugal; 19NBI, Natural Business Intelligence, Tec Labs 1.2.1, Campus da Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal; 20Meise Botanic Garden, Brussels, Belgium
Understanding patterns and drivers of ecological and biological phenomena at different scales, such as biological invasions, increasingly depends on collecting comprehensive data and making the best use of existing data. The proposed talk will address the concept of secondary data, which refers to additional information that is unintentionally captured in species records, especially in multimedia citizen science reports. Secondary data can provide ecologically relevant information that improves our understanding of interactions between native and alien organisms and their impact on biodiversity dynamics. We present the possibilities offered by secondary data, describe their main types and sources and give an overview of selected case studies in invasion biology. Finally, challenges to the wider use of secondary data, including biases, licensing issues, and a lack of awareness of this data source due to a lack of common language, are also discussed, along with possible solutions to overcome these barriers.
Time series of societal attention and perception during the invasion process based on recent introductions in the Iberian Peninsula
Rubén Rabaneda Bueno1, Ivan Jaric2, Pavel Pipek3, Ana Novoa3, María Loreto Castillo3, Petr Pyšek3, Valerio Sbragaglia4, Allan T. Souza5, César Capinha6, Gabriel H.O. Caetano2, Shawan Chowdhury7, Josh A. Firth8, Hanno Seebens9, Bronwen Hunter10
1Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic; 2University Paris Saclay, France; 3Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republi; 4Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC), Spain; 5University of Helsinki, Finland; 6University of Lisbon, Portugal; 7German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv); 8Oxford University, UK; 9Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Germany; 10University of Sussex, UK
Social networks can provide relevant information about the process of biological invasion, as users can share information about the invading species in real time, and societal perceptions of the invading species can provide valuable information about the risks of invasion, such as the likelihood of intentional introduction or potential management support or opposition. The use of historical data in time series analyses could be very helpful in predicting and providing early warning of an impending invasion. Here we use digital data to explore possible relationships between the societal interest that species elicit at different stages of invasion and the outcome of the invasion process. We also explore the identification of specific traits or keywords that characterise different levels of invasion risk and different invasion scenarios, and hypothesise that references to the species vary according to invasion stage. We observed a greater correspondence between the event of first discovery at a site and public interest raised prior to this event, with peaks indicating that awareness increases when the species is in the early stages of its invasion process. This study shows that culturomics data can be used to some extent to predict the risk of a species invading a new habitat.
Spatial-temporal patterns of public attention to invasive alien species across an invasion front: a case study from the Mediterranean Sea
Lara Fazzari1, Reut Vardi2, Ivan Jaric3, Ricardo Correia4, Valerio Sbragaglia1
1Institute of Marine Sciences, Spain; 2Tel Aviv University, Israel; 3Université Paris-Saclay, France; 4University of Turku, Finland
Biological invasions are considered one of the major threats to biodiversity, having ecological as well as socio-economic effects, frequently with negative impacts. To achieve effective conservation measures, understanding societal interest in invasive alien species is crucial since greater public attention can help mobilise conservation efforts, investments and success. One of the main challenges in monitoring societal interest is developing near-real-time indicators to cover large-scale spatial-temporal dynamics of public attention. The digital revolution has opened up new opportunities to alien species research and management. Here, we focus on the lionfish (Pterois miles) in the Mediterranean Sea and investigate spatial-temporal patterns of public interest in the species along its invasion gradient by using Google search volumes as a proxy for societal attention. Our study revealed that 1) public attention is higher in countries that have already experienced lionfish invasion compared to ones in which the species has yet to arrived; and 2) temporal patterns of societal attention do not seem to be fully related to the year of arrival of lionfish in a given country. While the first results confirm a clear, spatial pattern in public attention, further research is needed to investigate drivers of temporal trends.
|