Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 10th Sept 2026, 07:07:12pm CEST (Norway)
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
Green preferences and climate change mitigation Location: Auditorium A: Victor D. Norman Session Chair: Eline Augusta Jacobs, Stockholm School of Economics | |
| Presentation 3 | |
The Paradox of Environmental Consciousness: Dissecting the Gap Between Climate-Change Awareness, Environmental Concern and Policy Support. 1: Banque de France, France;; 2: University of Cambridge, UK.; 3: Sciences Po, Paris, France. This article examines the relationship between climate change awareness, environmental concern and support for climate mitigation and environmental policies across 30 countries, using data collected from 2019 to 2022. Drawing on repeated cross-sectional surveys, we combine factor analysis and structural equation modelling to investigate the role of macro-level aspects associated with country specificities, e.g. the level of economic development and the regulatory quality, on the link between awareness, concern and policy support. We consider also factors at the microlevel, i.e. traditional drivers associated to citizens’ sociodemographic profiles. Our findings show that while awareness and concern about climate change are widespread, these attitudes do not consistently lead to stronger support for climate mitigation and environmental policies and people’s attitudes are significantly influenced by their country’s stage of development. Notably, support for climate and environmental policies decreases in wealthier nations, potentially due to long-standing environmental regulations and perceived economic costs. Conversely, lower-income and upper-middle income countries exhibit stronger support for such policies, possibly due to fewer established environmental frameworks and more immediate challenges. These results hold under various specifications and highlight the variability in public support for climate action, shaped by both economic conditions and policy histories, challenging the assumption that higher awareness and concern automatically lead to increased policy backing. | |
