Conference Agenda

Since 2010, the Uruguayan government has fostered the installation of solar panels among firms to promote the production of small-scale renewable electricity. Under this policy, firms that have installed solar panels are allowed to feed any electricity surplus into the grid. Using a novel dataset on firm-level electricity consumption and grid feed-in, we study the economic and environmental consequences of this policy. First, we find that installing a solar panel substantially reduces the amount of electricity extracted from the grid. Second, we find that it increases the electricity injected into the grid. Third, we find that it reduces CO2 emissions only marginally. Fourth, we provide evidence of a rebound effect: electricity consumption increases between 20% and 26% after the solar panel installation. Lastly, we propose an alternative policy that allows firms to store their electricity surplus in batteries instead of immediately injecting it into the grid. This policy would further reduce CO2 emissions by 2.7%, allowing electricity injection into the grid at night when fossil fuel facilities satisfy most of the electricity demand. We use firm-level data to study the effects of a net-metering policy, showing what countries can expect from implementing such a policy.