Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 10th May 2025, 12:23:34am CEST

External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.

 
 
Session Overview
Session
Electricity markets: green preferences
Time:
Thursday, 04/July/2024:
11:00am - 12:45pm

Session Chair: Jonas Maeser, Ruhr University Bochum
Location: Campus Social Sciences, Room: AV 91.21

For information on room accessibility, click here

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations

Behavioral drawback of informing about a ''green'' electricity mix? Experimental evidence on a rebound effect in electricity demand response

Niklas Ziemann, Christin Hoffmann, Franziska Penske, Felix Müsgens

Brandenburg University of Technology, Germany

Discussant: Andrius Kazukauskas (Vilnius University)

Against the background of a transition to a decentralized and integrated energy system with an increasing share of renewables, we studied the impact of providing information about the electricity mix on the electricity demand response. We implemented a monetarily incentivized lab experiment. Participants could solve a real-effort task with or without the help of an additional electricity-demanding device. Using the device significantly positively impacted the participants' earnings. We used a between-subject design with four treatments that differed in the information provided about the electricity associated with using the additional device. In BASE, we informed the participants that using the device would cause additional electricity consumption. In GREEN and BROWN, we gave the same information as in BASE plus the information that the electricity mix was predominantly based on renewable (GREEN) or non-renewable sources (BROWN) at the time of the experiment. In our fourth treatment, GREEN BUT INFO, we gave the same information as in GREEN, but also highlighted that each unit of electricity additionally demanded would usually stem from non-renewable sources. Our results show a significant impact of our treatment intervention. Participants in GREEN demanded significantly more electricity compared to those in BASE, BROWN, and GREEN BUT INFO. These results highlight a rebound effect on electricity demand response due to the information describing a predominantly green electricity mix. Our findings are relevant given an increasing demand for electricity based on renewable sources due to ambitious climate goals and electrification processes in in the industrial, heating, and mobility sectors.



Prosumers , Energy Savings and Behavioral Interventions

Andrius Kazukauskas1, Jurate Jaraite1, Rimvydas Baltaduonis2

1Vilnius University, Lithuania; 2Gettysburg College, U.S.

Discussant: Marie-Charlotte Guetlein (Grenoble Ecole de Management)

Numerous field experiments have proven that various behavioral interventions encourage households to decrease their energy use. However, with increasing numbers of prosumers who not only consume but also generate their own electricity and sell or store the surplus on the grid, it is unclear whether the same behavioral interventions are effective for this type of household. We conduct a country-wide randomized control trial with over 900 households equipped with smart meters, to test behavioral interventions that encourage prosumers both to reduce electricity use during critical peak hours and to reduce total electricity use. We cooperate with a national distribution company in Lithuania that provides feedback on household electricity use via a mobile application we have developed that delivers real-time responses to our behavioral interventions. We investigate two types of incentives—monetary information in the form of notifications about surge prices in the wholesale market and non-monetary informational incentives in the form of social comparisons—separately and together. We find that both types of interventions are effective in reducing average net electricity use and increasing average net electricity production during surge price periods. We find that the combination of critical peak price notifications and social comparison information exhibits the highest effectiveness in conservation behavior.



Factors enabling or impeding the scaling-up of citizen investments in renewable energy cooperatives

Marie-Charlotte Guetlein1, Joachim Schleich1,2

1Grenoble Ecole de Management, France; 2Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research

Discussant: Jonas Maeser (Ruhr University Bochum)

This study empirically investigates factors that alternatively enable or impede the scaling-up of citizen investments in renewable energy cooperatives (RECs). These factors include key features of a Consumer Stock Ownership Plan (CSOP), namely co-investments by firms, a capital-based voting rule, and the delegation of capital-based voting rights by citizen investors to a trustee. Analyzing data from a survey of 1022 adults in France through a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and a contingent valuation experiment (CVE) on stated investments in RECs, we find that participants value the opportunity to delegate their voting rights to a trustee but dislike the capital-based voting rule and co-investments by firms. While a capital-based voting rule weakens the stated propensity to invest, it increases the invested amount for participants who are willing to invest some amount. Higher rates of return and higher shares of self-consumption of electricity spur stated investments. These findings offer insights that can inform the transformation of business models to facilitate the scaling-up of RECs. In particular, unless a CSOP generates higher rates of return, it appears to face a trade-off between lower citizen participation rates and the leveraging of higher investment amounts from firms, municipalities, and potentially also citizens.



PV Leasing Models: A Game Changer to PV Adoption?

Christoph Feldhaus1, Andreas Löschel1, Jonas Maeser1, Madeline Werthschulte2,3

1Ruhr University Bochum, Germany; 2Alfred Weber Institute for Economics, Heidelberg University; 3ZEW – Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research

Discussant: Niklas Ziemann (Brandenburg University of Technology)

The expansion of renewable resources critically hinges on the households investing in solar panels (PV). A major barrier to such investment, liquidity constrains, may be overcome by a new business model: the leasing of solar panels. We cooperate with the largest PV leasing provider in Germany and study its potential of being a game changer to solar adoption. Specifically, we compare the characteristics and economic preferences of PV adopters in the leasing-model, PV adopters in a classic `buy-model' and homeowners without solar panels, utilizing data from three incentivized survey waves. We find that PV leasing attracts a new customer segment with fewer profitability concerns and a higher altruism, but crowds out customers with a large aversion against risks. Such finding is consistent with the characteristics attributed to early adopters in the diffusion of innovations.



 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: EAERE 2024
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.153
© 2001–2025 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany