Conference Agenda

As the Anthropocene increasingly undermines natural systems, there is an urgent need for design to move beyond harm reduction toward active ecological restoration. Regenerative Design (RD) has emerged as a promising paradigm to complement sustainable design; however, fragmented knowledge and inconsistent terminology hinder designers’ systematic understanding. To bridge the gap between theory and practice, this study first reviews the philosophical stances and key approaches of RD, then examines its implementation in a coral reef restoration project on Weizhou Island. Reflection on the project revealed three major challenges: limited capacity for interdisciplinary collaboration, insufficient tools for stakeholder engagement, and inadequate dynamic assessment models. To address these challenges, the study proposes corresponding strategies: enhancing designers’ foundational cross-disciplinary knowledge to improve collaboration; developing guided tools on digital platforms to support stakeholder understanding; and employing artificial intelligence to analyze data from dynamic assessment models, providing scientifically grounded evaluations of RD practice.

This paper defines regenerative design in relation to current collaborative, sustainability-oriented innovation. Production and consumption patterns are largely linear, with circular economy efforts largely focused on recycling. Regenerative approaches are emerging but underdeveloped. Literature describes the Regenerative worldview and theoretical framework, and the few papers on methodology and practice highlight a need for greater definition of the field. An actionable design- and innovation methodology for the regenerative field is lacking. We conduct a scoping review and define the Regenerative design approach in relation to the current Circular Oriented Design approaches. We present the characteristics of the Value Preserving and Regenerative approaches found in literature. This contributes to a clearer, more actionable method of regenerative, post-anthropocentric design for design practitioners, and addresses the gap in academic literature. This framework aims to bring implementation closer, as conducting, managing, and structuring Regenerative Design is crucial to the ecological and cultural transformation needed.

This paper considers the development of a regenerative design practice as a grounded and participatory method that fosters sustainable design and solutions, sensitive to relational practices and values, even when these are thought to be negligible. We draw upon theories of ecological relationality, in combination with posthuman theory, to argue that holistic regenerative design should aim to foster ownership of the design processes amongst affected actors. To do so, our regenerative design practice allows participants to search for, promote, and expand existing practices of relationality, a focus we argue have been missing in the existing research on regenerative design. Drawing upon our research with industrial farmers in Norway, we illustrate how even the most modernist farmers care for their plants and soil. From this acknowledgement, we build a method for an inclusive regenerative design practice for identifying solutions to complex socio-environmental problem.

The design field is increasingly engaging with the challenge of regenerating Earth systems within planetary boundaries, yet the epistemic foundations of regenerative ecological design remain diffuse. This paper introduces Three-Eyed Seeing as a design framework that brings Western empirical methods, Indigenous relational knowledge, and futural imaginaries into accountable dialogue. The framework supports plural ways of knowing without collapsing them into a single worldview and positions designers as mediators across multiple ontological commitments. Drawing on an autoethnographic field encounter with pollinators at Kaʻena Point in Hawaiʻi alongside ecological systems-oriented design research, the study explores how these distinct ways of knowing can be practiced together within regenerative design inquiry. The encounter illustrates how observation, accountability, and futural imagination interact in practice, reframing regeneration as a collaborative process shaped by human and more-than-human partners. Three-Eyed Seeing provides conceptual grounding and methodological orientation for designers seeking to practice ecological regeneration as co-constitutive worldmaking.

Regenerative textile design begins in the soil, and ends in the oneone (soil). In this paper oneone is described and articulated by Papahoa Fibreworks (Papahoa or the organisation) as their context and guide for designing a textile production system in Aotearoa. The kaupapa (purpose, foundational approach) of context based design, alongside Hua Parakore has led Papahoa to offer organically grown linen, dye plants, and dye services for the local fashion industry. As a case study, Papahoa demonstrates both soil to oneone textile processes in Waitaha (Canterbury) historically, and looks into the future of how fibre production could be remodeled in Aotearoa as a regenerative industry. In this paper the practices of the organisation show the relationship both below and above soil. The interdependent relationships of local systems, and the opportunity to achieve textile motuhake (autonomy) in Aotearoa for successful regenerative, soil to oneone production.

This paper explores the possible contribution of ‘gap system’ within the context of regenerative design, highlighting how ‘gaps’, as overlooked, unexplored, and unrecalled dimensions of creative practice, can provide critical opportunities for regeneration. Drawing on ongoing research into weave structures conceptualised through the holes in between yarns, and by presenting the outcomes of a workshop, we illustrate the potential of thinking through ‘gaps’ as a nuanced perspective for regenerative design. Here, ‘gaps’ become sites of reflection, emergence, and transition. We show how this approach reshaped participants’ ways of mapping systems by focusing on ‘gaps’ rather than existing linear knowledge, enabling them to rethink disciplinary futures and, through a regenerative lens, reshape both the boundaries of their own practices and their reflection on those practices. Drawing on participants’ reflections, we argue that such spaces, often overlooked and unnoticed, constitute an unstructured generative site for rethinking design as a regenerative practice.