Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 15th June 2025, 08:09:04am WEST
Session Chair: Manuel Portela, University of Coimbra
Location:B302 (TB)
60 places
Presentations
Oracle Bone Reassembly Based on Diffusion Model
Guang Yang
BNU-HKBU United International College, China, People's Republic of
This paper introduces a machine learning approach to reassemble fragmented oracle bones, which are important materials for understanding early Chinese history. Specifically, we propose a model based on the Diffusion Model, a generative deep learning framework that has demonstrated remarkable performance in computer vision tasks in recent years.
Discrepancies in Annotative Concordance and Expertis: Analysing existing metrics in annotated archaeological fuzzy data
1Instituto de Estudios Gallegos Padre Sarmiento, CSIC; 2Universidad de Cantabria, Spain
Research in mathematics, computational sciences, and archaeological theory has addressed the uncertainty in archaeological data and its links to annotator expertise/confidence. This study uses real data and three annotators with varying expertise to evaluate concordance metrics for fuzzy annotations, applying computational linguistics and vector distance methods within fuzzy data models.
RDFProxy: A Model-Centric Approach to Transforming SPARQL Result Sets for Linked Data Clients
Lukas Plank, Katharina Wünsche
Austrian Academy of Sciences, Austria
The paper introduces RDFProxy, a Python library designed for building REST APIs on top of Knowledge Graphs using Pydantic models.
RDFProxy is currently being developed at the Austrian Center for Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage and will serve as the backend solution for the Releven project at University of Vienna.
Whose Pen Wrote the Map? Battling Over the Armenian Medieval Text Ashkharhatsuyts with Stylometry
Jean-Baptiste Camps, Chahan Vidal-Gorène
École nationale des chartes - Université PSL, France
This study examines the authorship of the Armenian geographical treatise Ashkharhatsuyts using stylometric methods. Results attribute the text to Anania Shirakatsi, aligning with prior hypotheses, while excluding Movses Khorenatsi. Uncertainty in early passages suggests potential compilations. Findings also question the authorship of Eghishe's Commentary on Genesis.
From Bias Paralysis to Bias as a Category of Analysis
Amber Zijlma, Mrinalini Luthra
Huygens Institute, The Netherlands
This paper addresses the lack of a coherent framework for understanding bias in digital humanities. Using colonial archives as case studies, it examines biases in archives, digitization, and AI. It proposes reframing bias as an analytical category and introduces a framework to dissect its interconnected dimensions.
