Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Session Overview |
Session | ||
WS: Integration in in-situ and SRS Integration - continued
| ||
Session Abstract | ||
ID: 572 / 4.04.2: 1 From Integrated In-Situ and Remote Sensing Campaigns to Open, Operational Biodiversity Data Products: Priorities, Gaps, and OpportunitiesAnabelle Cardoso1,8, Kyla Dahlin2, Mike Harfoot3, Erin Hestir4, Carsten Meyer5, Javier Pacheco-Labrador6, Christian Rossi7, Maria J. Santos7, Adam M. Wilson1 1 University at Buffalo, United States of America; 2 Michigan State University, United States of America; 3 Vizzuality, United Kingdom; 4 University of California Merced, United States of America; 5 iDiv; 6Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Spain; 7 University of Zurich, Switzerland; 8 University of Capetown, South Africa Conserving biodiversity is a global priority that urgently requires effective decision-making. Open, Operational Biodiversity Data Products (OOBDPs) that deliver information to decision makers at the appropriate spatiotemporal scale are critical to informing conservation policy and action across governments, corporations, and for local communities. Rapidly developing such systems will require efficient spatiotemporal scaling of biodiversity data products without losing their integrity. Scaling biodiversity data products is complex because biodiversity is intrinsically local; it is the product of a unique environmental and evolutionary history and is specific to a point in space and time. Local knowledge and in situ measurements that capture this complexity are resource-intensive to collect, and it is not feasible to do this everywhere all the time. Therefore, to create biodiversity data products for decision-making, you need to scale up local knowledge and in-situ measurements by integrating them with remote sensing data, which can be collected across large areas and at regular intervals. Integrating remote sensing and local data to produce biodiversity data products should go beyond simply pairing co-located field and remote sensing measurements, applying an algorithm, and producing a map of the world. Yet, this approach is common practice in academic, non-profit, and corporate settings, and the resulting maps are widely used by governments to inform policy and reporting. There is thus an urgent need for our community to propose an alternative strategy. This workshop aims to solicit feedback from the community on two major topics:
| ||
No contributions were assigned to this session. |
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address: Privacy Statement · Conference: BioSpace25 |
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.153+TC © 2001–2025 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany |
